Commons:Featured picture candidates
Other featured candidates:
Featured picture candidates ![]() Featured picture candidates are images that the community will vote on, to determine whether or not they will be highlighted as some of the finest on Commons. This page lists the candidates to become featured pictures. The picture of the day images are selected from featured pictures. Old candidates for Featured pictures are listed here. There are also chronological lists of featured pictures: 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 and current month. For another overview of our finest pictures, take a look at our annual picture of the year election. |
|||||||||||||||||||
Formal thingsNominatingGuidelines for nominatorsPlease read the complete guidelines before nominating. This is a summary of what to look for when submitting and reviewing FP candidates:
Artworks, illustrations, and historical documentsThere are many different types of non-photographic media, including engravings, watercolors, paintings, etchings, and various others. Hence, it is difficult to set hard-and-fast guidelines. However, generally speaking, works can be divided into three types: Those that can be scanned, those that must be photographed, and those specifically created to illustrate a subject. Works that must be photographed include most paintings, sculptures, works too delicate or too unique to allow them to be put on a scanner, and so on. For these, the requirements for photography, below, may be mostly followed; however, it should be noted that photographs which cut off part of the original painting are generally not considered featurable. Works that may be scanned include most works created by processes that allow for mass distribution − for instance, illustrations published with novels. For these, it is generally accepted that a certain amount of extra manipulation is permissible to remove flaws inherent to one copy of the work, since the particular copy – of which hundreds, or even thousands of copies also exist – is not so important as the work itself. Works created to serve a purpose include diagrams, scientific illustrations, and demonstrations of contemporary artistic styles. For these, the main requirement is that they serve their purpose well. Provided the reproduction is of high quality, an artwork generally only needs one of the following four things to be featurable:
Digital restorations must also be well documented. An unedited version of the image should be uploaded locally, when possible, and cross-linked from the file description page. Edit notes should be specified in detail, such as "Rotated and cropped. Dirt, scratches, and stains removed. Histogram adjusted and colors balanced." PhotographsOn the technical side, we have focus, exposure, composition, movement control and depth of field.
On the graphic elements we have shape, volume, color, texture, perspective, balance, proportion, noise, etc.
You will maximise the chances of your nominations succeeding if you read the complete guidelines before nominating. Video and audioPlease nominate videos, sounds, music, etc. at Commons:Featured media candidates. Set nominationsIf a group of images are thematically connected in a direct and obvious way, they can be nominated together as a set. A set should fall under one of the following types:
Simple tutorial for new usersAdding a new nominationIf you believe that you have found or created an image that could be considered valuable, with appropriate image description and licensing, then do the following. Step 1: copy the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg. Then click on the "create new nomination" button. All single files: For renominations, simply add /2 after the filename. For example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foo.jpg/2
All set nomination pages should begin "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/", e.g. "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/My Nomination".
Step 3: manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list: Click here, and add the following line to the TOP of the nominations list:
Galleries and FP categories: Please add a gallery page and section heading from the list at Commons FP galleries. Write the code as Page name#Section heading. For example: Optional: if you are not the creator of the image, please notify them using Note: Do not add an 'Alternative' image when you create a nomination. Selecting the best image is part of the nomination process. Alternatives are for a different crop or post-processing of the original image, or a closely related image from the same photo session (limited to 1 per nomination), if they are suggested by voters. VotingEditors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. Everybody can vote for their own nominations. Anonymous (IP) votes are not allowed. You may use the following templates:
You may indicate that the image has no chance of success with the template {{FPX|reason - ~~~~}}, where reason explains why the image is clearly unacceptable as a FP. The template can only be used when there are no support votes other than the one from the nominator. A well-written review helps participants (photographers, nominators and reviewers) improve their skills by providing insight into the strengths and weaknesses of a picture. Explain your reasoning, especially when opposing a candidate (which has been carefully selected by the author/nominator). English is the most widely understood language on Commons, but any language may be used in your review. A helpful review will often reference one or more of the criteria listed above. Unhelpful reasons for opposing include:
Remember also to put your signature (~~~~). Featured picture delisting candidatesOver time, featured picture standards change. It may be decided that for some pictures which were formerly "good enough", this is no longer the case. This is for listing an image which you believe no longer deserves to be a featured picture. For these, vote:
This can also be used for cases in which a previous version of an image was promoted to FP, but a newer version of the image has been made and is believed to be superior to the old version, e.g. a newly edited version of a photo or a new scan of a historical image. In particular, it is not intended for replacing older photos of a particular subject with newer photos of the same subject, or in any other case where the current FP and the proposed replacement are essentially different images. For these nominations, vote:
If you believe that some picture no longer meets the criteria for FP, you can nominate it for delisting, copying the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box: In the new delisting nomination page just created you should include:
After that, you have to manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list. As a courtesy, leave an informative note on the talk page(s) of the original creator, uploader(s), and nominator with a link to the delisting candidate. {{subst:FPC-notice-removal}} can be used for this purpose. Featured picture candidate policyGeneral rules
Featuring and delisting rulesA candidate will become a featured picture in compliance with following conditions:
The delisting rules are the same as those for FPs, with voting taking place over the same time period. The rule of the 5th day is applied to delisting candidates that have received no votes to delist, other than that of the proposer, by day 5. The FPCBot handles the vote counting and closing in most cases, current exceptions are candidates containing multiple versions of the image as well as FPXed and withdrawn nominations. Any experienced user may close the requests not handled by the bot. For instructions on how to close nominations, see Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished. Also note that there is a manual review stage between when the bot has counted the votes and before the nomination is finally closed by the bot; this manual review can be done by any user familiar with the voting rules. Above all, be politePlease don't forget that the image you are judging is somebody's work. Avoid using phrases like "it looks terrible" and "I hate it". If you must oppose, please do so with consideration. Also remember that your command of English might not be the same as someone else's. Choose your words with care. Happy judging… and remember… all rules can be broken. See also
|
Table of contents
Featured picture candidates
Voting period ends on 28 Mar 2025 at 20:57:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Family : Diogenidae (Left-handed Hermit Crabs)
Info Pale anemone hermit (Dardanus deformis) with anemones (Calliactis polypus), Zanzibar, Tanzania. This nocturnal hermit crab is known to transfer sea anemones from one shell to another when it moves to a different shell. Note: we have no FPs of the species Dardanus deformis. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:57, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:57, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Mar 2025 at 16:09:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Hesperiidae (Skippers)
Info created by Anitava Roy – uploaded by Anitava Roy – nominated by Anitava Roy -- Anitava Roy (talk) 16:09, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Anitava Roy (talk) 16:09, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Mar 2025 at 12:18:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Nymphalidae (Brush-footed Butterflies)
Info created & uploaded by Anitava Roy – nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 12:18, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 12:18, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Beautiful, and thankfully not a digitally added background. --Cart (talk) 12:53, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 16:28, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 17:05, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 18:09, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --imehling (talk) 19:25, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Mar 2025 at 09:34:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Canidae (Canids)
Info Jumping Australian Shepherd Dog. All by me -- Ermell (talk) 09:34, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Ermell (talk) 09:34, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
Comment Good light, nice action, but the resolution, only 2,058 × 1,594 pixels, is quite low, especially in this case where the background is huge compared to the animal's size. About the composition, I'm not sure so much empty sky is the best choice -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:18, 20 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Mar 2025 at 09:07:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Nectariniidae_(Sunbirds_and_Spiderhunters)
Info created by Sanjoykumar99 – uploaded by Sanjoykumar99 – nominated by Moheen -- ~Moheen (keep talking) 09:07, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- ~Moheen (keep talking) 09:07, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Nice pair and colors, but I'd like to have both birds with the same focus and quality. Plus the framing is a little awkward, and I wouldn't mind some more info in the description on the file page. --Cart (talk) 13:04, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Mar 2025 at 07:46:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/France#Occitanie
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 07:46, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 07:46, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
Neutral Nice enough to look at, but a bit generic 'mountain reflection in lake' composition. DoF also seems a bit short, leaving the mountain unsharp. With such nice conditions, a few stops more wouldn't have hurt. --Cart (talk) 13:10, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Mar 2025 at 07:41:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Switzerland
Info created by Kabelleger – uploaded by Kabelleger – nominated by Bruce1ee -- —Bruce1eetalk 07:41, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- —Bruce1eetalk 07:41, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 09:02, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Cart (talk) 13:12, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Looks a little like a model railway --imehling (talk) 19:29, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Mar 2025 at 07:16:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Shells#Family : Conidae
Info From the English Wikipedia article: "The shell of this mollusc species has special significance to shell collectors because it was once regarded as the rarest shell in the world. For about two centuries between its initial discovery and the discovery of its habitat in 1969, specimens were valued in the thousands of U.S. dollars and generally only owned by museums and wealthy private collectors. Furthermore, the shell's popularity among collectors spawned urban legends, most notably the story of a collector purchasing one at auction in 1792 only to destroy it, to maintain the value of another one already in his collection. Improvements in diving technology such as the advent of scuba led to their discovery in larger numbers, and today shells can often be found from retailers or online auction sites for less than $100 U.S. Nonetheless, the legacy of this shell in addition to its pleasing shape and patterns makes it popular and desirable among shell collectors today.";
created by Llez – uploaded by Llez – nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 07:16, 19 March 2025 (UTC)Support -- Llez (talk) 07:16, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 07:47, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 09:04, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Cart (talk) 13:14, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 27 Mar 2025 at 16:33:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Electronics
Info Downside of an AMD microprocessor (Ryzen Threadripper 7970X). The golden elements and plate-like carrier emphasize this hardware created by PantheraLeo1359531 – uploaded by PantheraLeo1359531 – nominated by PantheraLeo1359531 -- PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 16:33, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 16:33, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 27 Mar 2025 at 14:06:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Storms
Info created by the National Weather Service – uploaded & nominated by WeatherWriter -- WeatherWriter (talk) 14:06, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- WeatherWriter (talk) 14:06, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Mobile phone quality, chromatic aberrations, unimpressive composition. Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:26, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
Oppose I assume this is from the DAT, don’t they take damage photos using mobile devices? I like the composition, it just isn’t up to that level of quality. Now a photo of the Diaz swept slab, I’d support that. EF5 ._. (talk - contribs) 11:52, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
Oppose per Basile. Yes, the EXIF says it's a mobile shot, hard to get FP quality with those. --Cart (talk) 13:18, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 26 Mar 2025 at 16:43:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus_:_Larus
Info Ring-billed gull (Larus delawarensis) comes in for an unwelcome landing. all by — Rhododendrites talk | 16:43, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
Support — Rhododendrites talk | 16:43, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Nice compo! You get this species from a variety of angles in one photo with pleasant colors. And as usual, Rhododendrites captures scenes that just beg to captioned. :-D A good storyteller he is. --Cart (talk) 17:11, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 00:02, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
Support —Bruce1eetalk 17:05, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Bird in flight well captured -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:15, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Anitava Roy (talk)
Voting period ends on 26 Mar 2025 at 15:45:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Sturnidae (Starlings)
Info Two Chestnut-tailed Starling (Sturnia malabarica), created and uploaded by Princepauljoy – nominated by আফতাবুজ্জামান -- আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 15:45, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 15:45, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
Neutral Great moment and nice composition, but the oversharpening is too visible for my taste and the bright red blob at the bottom is distracting. BigDom (talk) 16:25, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
Weak oppose for now - seriously overprocessed. Less importantly, we probably need something relevant in the filename (before/after the photographer's title) -- it's not a kiss, of course. — Rhododendrites talk | 16:49, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
Oppose I'm going full out with an oppose because that over-processing is not necessary for such an action shot. I helped what I could with the description and categories, but the re-naming that should be done is up to the author. --Cart (talk) 17:14, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
- @W.carter, @Rhododendrites: Thanks for the suggestion :) I fixed the title and also asked the author to fix the oversharpening if possible. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 17:35, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
- Ok. I'll wait. Remarkably, you managed to make the file move and update the nomination the right way. Good. If you do this again, just don't leave a redirect behind for nominations. They become redundant after the move and will only beg to be closed after nine days, clogging up the system. I've placed an SD on it now. --Cart (talk) 18:40, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
- @BigDom, Rhododendrites, and W.carter: Please take a look again. Author uploaded a new version. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 22:22, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
- Ok. I'll wait. Remarkably, you managed to make the file move and update the nomination the right way. Good. If you do this again, just don't leave a redirect behind for nominations. They become redundant after the move and will only beg to be closed after nine days, clogging up the system. I've placed an SD on it now. --Cart (talk) 18:40, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
- @W.carter, @Rhododendrites: Thanks for the suggestion :) I fixed the title and also asked the author to fix the oversharpening if possible. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 17:35, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry but still badly oversharpened for me Cmao20 (talk) 00:04, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
- No worries :) As a final attempt, I asked the author to share the original raw file with me. Let's see if I or someone else can fix it. Please give me a day. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 01:53, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
- Author shared the raw file here. Please help to fix the issue described above comments. Please upload multiple versions. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 10:31, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
- We'll see if someone takes this offer, but remember that the FPC is not a workshop. When a file is presented here it should be in as good shape as possible. We often allow new nominators some leeway, helping with suggestions, texts and categories but you can't rely on it as it wears down reviewers. A more experienced nominator would {{Withdraw}} the nom and come back with a new one later when the issues are fixed outside FPC. --Cart (talk) 11:38, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
- I took a pass here. The colors/background don't exactly match, so the uploader may want to redo what they did there -- I mainly did some noise reduction, tone adjustment, a little selective additional denoising, and crop. — Rhododendrites talk | 12:27, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
- A nice attempt, certainly better than the first one, but the main problem with this is that it's taken with ISO 2,000. I think about half of that might have been enough and given some better detail. --Cart (talk) 12:59, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
- I took a pass here. The colors/background don't exactly match, so the uploader may want to redo what they did there -- I mainly did some noise reduction, tone adjustment, a little selective additional denoising, and crop. — Rhododendrites talk | 12:27, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
- We'll see if someone takes this offer, but remember that the FPC is not a workshop. When a file is presented here it should be in as good shape as possible. We often allow new nominators some leeway, helping with suggestions, texts and categories but you can't rely on it as it wears down reviewers. A more experienced nominator would {{Withdraw}} the nom and come back with a new one later when the issues are fixed outside FPC. --Cart (talk) 11:38, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
- Dear colleagues @Princepauljoy, আফতাবুজ্জামান, BigDom, Rhododendrites, W.carter, and Cmao20: As requested by the nominator by email today, I have processed the image using the original Raw file (Nikon Nef). The Camera Raw processing settings, the Raw file itself, the Dng file (which served as the basis for my further processing) and the final Jpg, which I additionally refined with another program, are available via the following SwissTransfer link. The original image had a different approach to saturation and color management. I deliberately took a more restrained approach in my work to avoid overly intense color, saturation or tonality. I also agree with Cart that the ISO setting of 2000 was a challenge, making noise reduction more difficult. In addition, I adjusted the cropping slightly to create a more balanced composition (from my perspective). However, I think the overall result is not too bad. Please feel free to use this version as the basis for a derivative work, or to overwrite the existing one in support of the nomination process. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 20:44, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
I really appreciate everyone for helping. I will give the edited file to the original author to upload as a separate/derivative file.
As for this file, I I withdraw my nomination. Again, thank you. --আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 23:10, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 26 Mar 2025 at 14:19:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#India
Info all by imehling -- imehling (talk) 14:19, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- imehling (talk) 14:19, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, I think there could be an FP in this motif but the lack of symmetry is too obvious here. I also think it's somewhat underexposed - a whitewashed building illuminated by sunlight should be a lot brighter than this. BigDom (talk) 16:30, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
Neutral quality is good, but agree with BigDom that it feels unbalanced. — Rhododendrites talk | 16:50, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
Oppose The shadow and the asymmetric view is not appealing to me, sorry --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 16:22, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Ok, this picture will probably fail. --imehling (talk) 19:22, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 26 Mar 2025 at 12:03:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Electronics
Info created – uploaded – nominated by Berthold Werner -- Berthold Werner (talk) 12:03, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Berthold Werner (talk) 12:03, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
Oppose I'm sorry, this is technically excellent and with a really good composition, but the state of the phone is too off-putting for me. In some cases dust and signs of use, even spider webs, can add to the atmosphere in a photo (1, 2). But for a studio photo (with a meticulously clean background) of modern plastic antiques that are so easy to wipe clean, dust and grime visible even at thumb, is not a good look. Compare with the photos of Evan-Amos. For shots in situ at a period location, things are different. I would also expect better categorization from a veteran Commons user (I've fixed it now). --Cart (talk) 13:49, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
Weak support - Going to head the other way from Cart on this one. :) The retrotech fan in me likes the idea of giving an old, shabby phone, with all its flaws, the studio treatment. — Rhododendrites talk | 16:52, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
Weak oppose I was ready to support but after noting Cart's comment I just can't un-see it, sorry. I do think that makes it less than the high standard for an FP. Cmao20 (talk) 23:59, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
Support I like reality as the highest standard. Анастасия Львоваru/en 15:09, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 26 Mar 2025 at 05:47:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Fungi#Family : Bolbitiaceae
Info Bolbitius titubans. This delicate fungus grows between grass. Focus stack of 38 photos.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:47, 17 March 2025 (UTC)Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:47, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 11:34, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --BigDom (talk) 16:22, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 19:19, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 15:21, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 07:48, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 19:38, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Mar 2025 at 22:31:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Family_:_Family : Odontodactylidae
Info Peacock mantis shrimp (Odontodactylus scyllarus), Anilao, Philippines. This species ranges in size from 3–18 centimetres (1.2–7.1 in) and is a burrower, constructing U-shaped holes in the loose substrate near the bases of coral reefs in water ranging from 3–40 metres (9.8–131.2 ft). It's a smasher, with club-shaped raptorial appendages. An agile and active intertidal and sub-intertidal predator, it prefers gastropods, crustaceans, and bivalves, and will repeatedly deliver blunt force to the exoskeleton of its prey until it can gain access to the underlying soft tissue for consumption. It is reported to have a "punch" of over 80 km/h (50 miles/h), the fastest recorded punch of any living animal. The acceleration is similar to that in a .22 LR bullet fired from a handgun. Note: after reading this I definitely believe that I got too close to it. A smash would have broken my port lens and (by flooding) the camera and lens. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 22:31, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 22:31, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Superb detail on the eyes Cmao20 (talk) 11:32, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --BigDom (talk) 16:22, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
Support per Cmao20. --Harlock81 (talk) 19:18, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 16:22, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 19:34, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Mar 2025 at 22:16:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#France
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 22:16, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 22:16, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:25, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Comment Amazingly beautiful picture with crisp reflections and lovely composition but just to check, the far-away tower on the right actually does lean like that? Just checking it's not perspective distortion Cmao20 (talk) 22:32, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Comment Indeed; the tower on the right is leaning in reality. --Tournasol7 (talk) 22:39, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support then Cmao20 (talk) 08:08, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
Support - Benh (talk) 08:59, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- but it's a pity that you didn't have a boat ;) --A.Savin 09:03, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 10:03, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Cart (talk) 10:57, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:54, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --BigDom (talk) 16:22, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
Neutral Great shot, but it feels a little unreal. I think it's the color brightness/saturation, which goes beyond what I'd expect at this time of day, even with a longer aperture. Certainly not going to oppose with the "wow" that this has, though. — Rhododendrites talk | 16:54, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Nice blue hour mood. --Rbrechko (talk) 17:45, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 19:17, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 15:17, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Great Poco a poco (talk) 17:52, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Really great, if the tower on the right is really leaning. --Milseburg (talk) 20:02, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Great mood, nice light and composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:09, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:33, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Mar 2025 at 21:21:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Styles and Techniques#Minimalism
Info Went to photograph a lake; came home with bike rack photo. Life as usual for a wiki photographer. All by me, -- Cart (talk) 21:21, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Cart (talk) 21:21, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support A splash of fun in the world Cmao20 (talk) 22:31, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 15:16, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
Support The colours are awesome --imehling (talk) 19:32, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 19:34, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Mar 2025 at 15:29:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Books_and_Paper
Info digitized by the Polish Central Archives of Historical Records, uploaded by Lukasz Truscinski, nominated by Yann
Info Janusz, prince of Wisła, Warsaw, Zakroczym and Ciechanów, grants the citizens of Warsaw the privilege to build a bathhouse and allocates the income from it to the needs of the city, 26 July 1376.
Support Historical document is very high resolution. -- Yann (talk) 15:29, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Super high quality and interesting Cmao20 (talk) 22:30, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 15:16, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 19:34, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Mar 2025 at 13:44:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family : Cyprinidae (Carps and Allies)
Info Koi in a garden pond. (Or, selfie in the morning before my coffee.) Additional info given by the pond's owner: Due to the cold climate, the koi live in an indoor pond during the cold seasons. In spring they are moved to the outdoor pond. During the first days outside, the koi are sensitive to the strong sunlight, so the water is kept 'murky' with a fish-friendly coloring to provide shade and an awning is placed over the pond. This was one of those days. When they have adapted to the sunlight, the water will be filtered and cleared. These koi are about 0.7 m (2.3 ft) long. All by me, W.carter -- Cart (talk) 13:44, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Cart (talk) 13:44, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Ugly fish, but interesting. And your comment made it. --Yann (talk) 15:17, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Fascinating pond monster photographed really well under difficult circumstances. --Kritzolina (talk) 18:53, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 20:21, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support I think it's cute! Cmao20 (talk) 22:29, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:52, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Nightmares. — Rhododendrites talk | 16:55, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 17:49, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:53, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:32, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Mar 2025 at 12:23:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Industry#Germany
Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 12:23, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- XRay 💬 12:23, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
*
Oppose I'm sorry, I'm sure this looked amazing when seeing it IRL but per what I said below on the other nom, illumination like this will wipe out details in photos and it's not working here. There are too many layers of black/dark elements and it comes out a bit messy for me. A closer crop might have been better. --Cart (talk) 12:54, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for your review. The certain restlessness in Hochofenstraße is due to the many elements along the street. This underlines the former bustle - in my opinion. BTW: At daylight there are much more rusty steel. --XRay 💬 14:14, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
- I have taken up your idea with the smaller crop. Thank you for this idea. I think the photo will benefit from it. --XRay 💬 14:22, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support That calmed things down considerably, thanks. Changed to support. And to answer your BTW, lots of rusty steel in daylight usually works since it's more subdued and uniform in color and daylight will be kinder to details. A really cool place, similar to Furillen on Gotland that I often used for model photos. I can spend weeks in places like these. :-) --Cart (talk) 15:22, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
- The landscape park is also often used for filming. Scenes from “Tribute to Panem” were filmed there. When we were there now, filming was underway for “Babylon Berlin”. --XRay 💬 15:44, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 22:29, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 19:33, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Mar 2025 at 11:42:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Industry#Germany
Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 11:42, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- XRay 💬 11:42, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Striking! A good thing the objects are so big, since illuminations like these tend to obliterate details in photos, but here it works. --Cart (talk) 12:20, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Amazing color composition --Kritzolina (talk) 18:55, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 22:19, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support per Kritzolina Cmao20 (talk) 22:28, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:33, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:55, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:51, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --imehling (talk) 16:52, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
Support good eye, as usual — Rhododendrites talk | 16:56, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 19:15, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 15:14, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
Support I think it's very appealing because of the cold/warm color contrast --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 16:17, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Mar 2025 at 10:41:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Muscicapidae (Old World Flycatchers)
Info created by Sanjoykumar99 – uploaded by Sanjoykumar99 – nominated by Moheen -- ~Moheen (keep talking) 10:41, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- ~Moheen (keep talking) 10:41, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support A bit over-sharpened, but the compo is picture-perfect. --Cart (talk) 12:22, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support For me it is often about the colors when I support a picture - and I really love the blues and greens here. And of course it a very well executed bird shots in other areas as well. --Kritzolina (talk) 18:57, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 22:19, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support per Cart Cmao20 (talk) 22:28, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:34, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:50, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
Support per Cart. BigDom (talk) 16:31, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --imehling (talk) 16:49, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 15:12, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Mar 2025 at 03:39:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Germany
Info Beautiful photo of this thirteenth century German cathedral. I like the effect that the sweeping clouds have in making the architecture look dramatic and impressive. No FPs from this place. created by A.Savin – uploaded by A.Savin – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 03:39, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 03:39, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Not easy to take. Well done and outstanding in my eyes. --Milseburg (talk) 11:06, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support per Milseburg, well done Alexander and thanks to Cmao20. --Terragio67 (talk) 11:16, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Cart (talk) 12:24, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Thanks Cmao20 for nominating it --A.Savin 13:46, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 22:19, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:54, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 08:23, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 10:01, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:48, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --imehling (talk) 16:48, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 15:11, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 25 Mar 2025 at 03:39:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Other land vehicles
Info IMO a really good and well composed 'action photo' of a harvest. I have placed it into the 'land vehicles' gallery as there are two other FPs of combine harvesters in there already (neither as good as this one in my opinion) but there's an argument it should be in the 'agriculture' gallery, please change if you think that'd be better. created by Ermell – uploaded by Ermell – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 03:39, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 03:39, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support —Bruce1eetalk 07:57, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Not the most artistic compo, but that is very hard to do with these harvester (I've tried!) and the technical quality and isolation of the subject more than makes up for it. Gallery is fine for me. --Cart (talk) 12:35, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 15:15, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Thi (talk) 18:24, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 22:19, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Thanks for the nom Cmao20--Ermell (talk) 22:43, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:52, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:47, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 17:48, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 15:10, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Mar 2025 at 09:32:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1940-1949
Info created by US Army, restored, uploaded, and nominated by Yann
Info Two children watch, from the ruins of the castle ramparts on the north slope, the passage of an American Jeep preceded by a Citroën traction avant on the rue des Noyers located between the upper town, on the left and the Dollée.
- The children are two brothers: Max and Jean Robin 12 and 8 years old. Their father is Raymond Robin, a resistance fighter executed by the Germans on June 15, 1944 in Beaucoudray. In the background an armored vehicle with GIs and at the top left the Agneaux college. In the background on the left, the Institut Libre d'Agneaux where the Germans began to dig an air-raid shelter from 1943 in the basement (now completely flooded and inaccessible), so at about the same time as the underground. This shelter, which was still not finished before the Germans left, had a total length of 135 meters and a width of 2 meters, with 6 rooms. General der Artillerie Erich Marcks commander of the LXXXIV AK used it as his HQ until his death on June 12, 1944, but it is not known why and when he left the castle of Commines.
- A German garrison occupied these places upon their arrival in June 1940 and from June 19 it was one of the four French prisoner of war camps in Saint-Lô (Frontstalag) until these prisoners were sent to Germany in November 1940.
- This is the place. Taken from nearly the same place 70 years later.
Support -- Yann (talk) 09:32, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 03:18, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 19:32, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Mar 2025 at 10:31:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#North Rhine-Westphalia
Info Heath and protected area Neuer Hagen on the northern slope of the Clemensberg in the Sauerland. All by me. -- Milseburg (talk) 10:31, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Milseburg (talk) 10:31, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
Support The earthy, subdued colors at this time of year are unique to me.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:46, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 03:18, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Looks like a classical painting Cmao20 (talk) 03:42, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:42, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Well depicted. --Terragio67 (talk) 11:22, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support The light got me. --Cart (talk) 13:21, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 15:37, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:37, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:45, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --imehling (talk) 16:54, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 19:13, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 24 Mar 2025 at 08:12:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Photo techniques/Composites and Montages#Composites (Multiple images merged into one)
Info a SSB-Drag-Bike. The aerodynamic full fairing is designed to be transparent for a better view to the technology. created by Auge=mit – uploaded by Auge=mit – nominated by Auge=mit -- Auge=mit (talk) 08:12, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
Abstain As author. -- Auge=mit (talk) 08:12, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 09:23, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
Support A very cool and interesting illustration of such bikes. I see that there is a bit of a difference (center front hole) where some parts of the bike have moved a bit between the shots, and as a result they are "doubled". Has any part of the image been created by some computer program or is it just two images merged? --Cart (talk) 12:04, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
Comment it is all photoshop/handmade (two pictures on different layers plus some layers for the shadows)... an other version can be seen at commons (for a better understanding) best regards, --Auge=mit (talk) 15:58, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks! A very good job with the photos, very creative and certainly not something we usually see here. I've added links between the different versions on the file pages for easier viewing.--Cart (talk) 16:12, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
- thanks to you too for finding the perfect gallery… Auge=mit (talk) 17:16, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks! A very good job with the photos, very creative and certainly not something we usually see here. I've added links between the different versions on the file pages for easier viewing.--Cart (talk) 16:12, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Nice work.--Ermell (talk) 18:21, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Looks really cool. Was the Wikipedia wordmark added digitally? dllu (talk) 00:11, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, it‘s digitally, because i found a lot of common-pictures on different websites without any appropriate credit - as required by the license… best regards, Auge=mit (talk) 01:13, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
- if the „WP-watermark“ is against the rules, i can easily hide the layer in photoshop…--Auge=mit (talk) 01:37, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
- It's not against any rules but in this case with all the other stickers and advertising on the bike, it could be interpreted as if Wikipedia is sponsoring the bike and its driver, and that is misleading. I suggest you remove it. "Watermarking" images like this is not something that is done for the reason you are giving. Non-credited Commons pictures needs to be dealt with in other ways. --Cart (talk) 12:42, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Done...--Auge=mit (talk) 07:31, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
- It's not against any rules but in this case with all the other stickers and advertising on the bike, it could be interpreted as if Wikipedia is sponsoring the bike and its driver, and that is misleading. I suggest you remove it. "Watermarking" images like this is not something that is done for the reason you are giving. Non-credited Commons pictures needs to be dealt with in other ways. --Cart (talk) 12:42, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
- if the „WP-watermark“ is against the rules, i can easily hide the layer in photoshop…--Auge=mit (talk) 01:37, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 03:18, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Cool stuff Cmao20 (talk) 03:42, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:42, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:44, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 19:32, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Mar 2025 at 23:30:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United States
Info created by dllu – uploaded by dllu – nominated by Dllu -- dllu (talk) 23:30, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- dllu (talk) 23:30, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Cart (talk) 12:13, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 03:18, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Weak support Definitely FP-level composition, and superb resolution and detail. I'm not sure about the washed-out, greyish light on the building on the left. Cmao20 (talk) 03:41, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
- There was a street lamp just out of frame there and it was foggy. dllu (talk) 04:54, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:41, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 11:25, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:00, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:39, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --imehling (talk) 16:53, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
Support — Rhododendrites talk | 16:58, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
Support ~Moheen (keep talking) 22:21, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Mar 2025 at 17:10:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Corvidae_(Crows,_Jays_and_Magpies)
Info Fish crow (Corvus ossifragus), cousin of the far more common American crow. all by — Rhododendrites talk | 17:10, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
Support — Rhododendrites talk | 17:10, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
Oppose While it is a technically decent capture, it's an ordinary photo of a relatively common bird. This seems to be precisely the kind of thing that Quality Image was designed for. dllu (talk) 23:33, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Detail, quality, and simple clear composition are sufficient for FP for me Cmao20 (talk) 00:11, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:40, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Agree, no the easiest subject to get a good focus of but it's tto simple and detail level not high for such a common subject. Poco a poco (talk) 12:53, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Comment Not going to dispute the straightforward composition (though I do like the bokeh), but going to disagree -- at least based on my experience -- about them being quite common. I'm squarely in their range and while I hear their call as they fly overhead sometimes, I almost never see them down low. Maybe two or three times ever? Certainly possible my experience is not the norm, though, but I appreciated this one being exceptionally "cooperative". Easily confused with American crows, though, which are roughly 60x more numerous. FWIW. — Rhododendrites talk | 19:37, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Mar 2025 at 12:21:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Cemeteries#Serbia
Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 12:21, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Pudelek (talk) 12:21, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Striking and well composed Cmao20 (talk) 14:15, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 03:19, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:38, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 04:58, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
Support ~Moheen (keep talking) 22:21, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Mar 2025 at 08:53:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Germany
Info Coronation of the Virgin (in the center), Saint Peter (left), and Paul the Apostle (right), main altar, parish church St. Genesius, Riedböhringen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany. To prevent a discussion: The three blue columns on the left side of the altar are also not exactly vertical in reality; created by Llez – uploaded by Llez – nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 08:53, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Llez (talk) 08:53, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 10:14, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:28, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
Comment Very beautiful, but the perspective seems a little strange to me. I'm struggling to find much in the picture that's either symmetrical or properly straight. Cmao20 (talk) 14:14, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
Info You are right, this old baroque altar is not symmetrical at all. You can compare it with this and this picture from another autor, taken from different angles, where you see the same asymmetries. It is therefore not caused by the angel of view or the photographer, but of the real assymetry of the altar, caused by the (unknown) artist who created the altar. --Llez (talk) 15:19, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
- I think I would prefer a photo like the first one you link to (though of course of higher quality). This one is too close and it just looks strange to me. Lacking the context of the overall appearance of the altar makes the asymmetries appear disorienting Cmao20 (talk) 15:45, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --XRay 💬 10:54, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 11:15, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:48, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
--Sebring12Hrs (talk) 20:40, 15 March 2025 (UTC)Oppose Leaning to the right.
Comment Please check the horizontal lines (e.g. using the grid or auxiliary lines of Photoshop). They are exactly level! --Llez (talk) 06:02, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Comment I remove my opposing vote. I agree, this ok. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 11:27, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 22:19, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 04:58, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Mar 2025 at 23:21:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#People_at_work
Info created by Sofiane mohammed amri – nominated by Riad Salih -- Riad Salih (talk) 23:21, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Riad Salih (talk) 23:21, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
Weak support Nice picture. The crop is too tight for the bus, but it is not for the windshield. There are also some technical flaws. The interior of the bus is too dark, while the sky is overexposed. --Harlock81 (talk) 14:01, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Yaqub Qomarudin Dibiazah (talk) 16:16, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:36, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Timetable (day 5 after nomination)
Sat 15 Mar → Thu 20 Mar Sun 16 Mar → Fri 21 Mar Mon 17 Mar → Sat 22 Mar Tue 18 Mar → Sun 23 Mar Wed 19 Mar → Mon 24 Mar Thu 20 Mar → Tue 25 Mar
Timetable (day 9 after nomination, last day of voting)
Tue 11 Mar → Thu 20 Mar Wed 12 Mar → Fri 21 Mar Thu 13 Mar → Sat 22 Mar Fri 14 Mar → Sun 23 Mar Sat 15 Mar → Mon 24 Mar Sun 16 Mar → Tue 25 Mar Mon 17 Mar → Wed 26 Mar Tue 18 Mar → Thu 27 Mar Wed 19 Mar → Fri 28 Mar Thu 20 Mar → Sat 29 Mar
Closing a featured picture promotion request
The bot
Note that the description below is for manual closure, this is mostly not needed anymore as there exists a bot (FPCBot) that counts the votes and handles the process below. However after the bot has counted the votes a manual review step is used to make sure the count is correct before the bot again picks up the work.
Manual procedure
Any experienced user may close requests.
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Bridge (August 2013).jpg). See also {{FPC-results-reviewed}}.
{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=x|oppose=x|neutral=x|featured=("yes" or "no")|gallery=xxx (leave blank if "featured=no")|sig=~~~~}} - Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
featured or not featured
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], featured === - Save your edit.
- If it is featured:
- Add the picture to the list of the four most recently featured pictures of an appropriate gallery of Commons:Featured pictures, list as the first one and delete the last one, so that the number is four again.
- Also add the picture to the appropriate gallery and section of Commons:Featured pictures, list. Click on the most appropriate link beneath where you just added it as one of the four images. An image should only appear ONE time in the galleries. After a successful nomination, the image can be placed in several of the Featured pictures categories.
- Add the template {{Assessments|featured=1}} to the image description page.
- If it was an alternative image, use the subpage/com-nom parameter: For example, if File:Foo.jpg was promoted at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bar.jpg, use {{Assessments|featured=1|com-nom=Bar.jpg}}
- If the image is already featured on another wikipedia, just add featured=1 to the Assessments template. For instance {{Assessments|enwiki=1}} becomes {{Assessments|enwiki=1|featured=1}}
- Add the picture to the chronological list of featured pictures. Put it in the gallery using this format: File:xxxxx.jpg|# - '''Headline'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
- The # should be replaced by 1 for the first image nominated that month, and counts up after that. Have a look at the other noms on that page for examples.
- You may simplify this if multiple things were done by the same user. E.g.: File:xxxxx.jpg|# - '''Headline'''<br>created, uploaded, and nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
- Add == FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotion|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the Talk Page of the nominator.
- As the last step (whether the image is featured or not; including {{FPX}}ed, {{FPD}}ed and withdrawn nominations), open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination you've just finished closing. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/March 2025), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.
Closing a delisting request
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
'''Result:''' x delist, x keep, x neutral => /not/ delisted. ~~~~
(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/Image:Astrolabe-Persian-18C.jpg) - Also edit the title of the delisting candidate image template and add after the image tag
delisted or not delisted
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] === becomes === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], delisted === - Move the actual template from Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list to the bottom of the actual month page on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/March 2025.
- If the outcome was not delisted, stop here. If it is delisted:
- Remove the picture from Commons:Featured pictures, list and any subpages.
- Edit the picture's description as follows:
- Replace the template {{Featured picture}} on the image description page by {{Delisted picture}}. If using the {{Assessments}} template, change featured=1 to featured=2 (do not change anything related to its status in other featured picture processes).
- Remove the image from all categories beginning with "Featured [pictures]" (example: Featured night photography, Featured pictures from Wiki Loves Monuments 2016, Featured pictures of Paris).
- Remove the "Commons quality assessment" claim (d:Property:P6731) "Wikimedia Commons featured picture" from the picture's Structured data.
- Add a delisting-comment to the original entry in chronological list of featured pictures in bold-face, e. g. delisted 2007-07-19 (1-6) with (1-6) meaning 1 keep and 6 delist votes (change as appropriate). The picture in the gallery is not removed.
- If this is a Delist and Replace, the delisting and promotion must both be done manually. To do the promotion, follow the steps in the above section. Note that the assessment tag on the file page and the promotion tag on the nominator's talk page won't pick up the /replace subpage that these nominations use.
Manual archiving of a withdrawn nomination
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
In the occasion that the FPCbot will not mark withdrawn nominations with a "to be reviewed" template and put them in Category:Featured picture candidates awaiting closure review just like if they were on the usual list, put the following "no" template:
{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=X|oppose=X|neutral=X|featured=no|gallery=|sig=--~~~~}} - Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
not featured
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], not featured === - Save your edit.
- Open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/March 2025), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.