User talk:Grunpfnul

This is Grunpfnul’s talk page, where you can send messages and comments to Grunpfnul.

This is not a forum for general discussion of the page’s subject.
Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~).
New to Commons? Check out the project scope. Ask questions, get answers.

Archives: 1

File source is not properly indicated: File:Bildschirmfoto 2024-10-12 um 11.07.34.png

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Bildschirmfoto 2024-10-12 um 11.07.34.png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

A.Savin 11:56, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Der Urheber ist erkennbar und angegeben, der Nutzen für Commons aber nicht; Das Bild wurde während einer QI Diskussion zur Darstellung der Fehler erstellt und genutzt. Eine Löschung ist in meinen Augen durchaus sinnvoll, nur die Angabe der Begründung ist inkorrekt. Grunpfnul (talk) 12:03, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Natürlich ist die Angabe korrekt. Ein abgeleitetes Werk muss stets auch das Originalwerk als Quellenangabe enthalten, das fehlt dort ganz klar. --A.Savin 12:13, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Da ich mit der Löschung d'accord bin, trage ich diese jetzt nicht nach. Grunpfnul (talk) 12:23, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! AC BD Pontstraße 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Rbrechko 16:15, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Demo Hackländerstr.

hi, ist das https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:AC_SO_Omas_gegen_Rechts_18.01.2025.jpg in Aachen?. Danke. Fazhbr (talk) 16:16, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ja Grunpfnul (talk) 17:12, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

hab ich hier eingebunden, danke https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proteste_gegen_Rechtsextremismus_in_Deutschland_und_%C3%96sterreich_2025. Fazhbr (talk) 19:12, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pictures of Haus Löwenstein (Aachen).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]